gender isn’t a social construct

September 20, 2015 § 2 Comments

If sexual orientation is biologically rooted, rather than socially constructed, then gender would be similarly biologically rooted to the degree that it is related to sexual orientation.

Nobody would claim that gender is entirely biological, of course.  I think it’s pretty unlikely that there is a genetic basis for little boys preferring G. I. Joes and girls Barbie dolls.  We can probably say with relative confidence that superficial aspects of gender are indeed attributable to cultural convention, but unless we’re prepared to either argue that gender has no connection to sexual orientation or that sexual orientation is culturally constructed, the feminist contention that gender is constructed is inconsistent.

What coherent counter argument can a feminist make?  If she argues that sexual orientation is culturally constructed, then she has put herself on the same side of the debate as religious conservatives who believe that homosexuals can pray the gay away in Jesus camp.  If she wants to argue that sexual orientation has no relationship to gender identity, how would she even support this argument?  Maybe it’s possible to support it, but it certainly seems counter intuitive and highly unlikely.

I suppose she would have no choice but to choose the latter counter argument and contend that gender has no relationship to sexual orientation, because otherwise she would have to concede to a position which would render the whole of feminism incoherent.  If gender is not culturally constructed, then there is no possible equality, no possible victory for feminists to win.

So our hypothetical feminist is stuck in this corner and has to dissociate a biologically rooted sexual orientation from a culturally constructed gender identity, unless there’s some other way out of the trap that I’m not thinking of.

Advertisements

§ 2 Responses to gender isn’t a social construct

  • RCB says:

    “So our hypothetical feminist is stuck in this corner and has to dissociate a biologically rooted sexual orientation from a culturally constructed gender identity, unless there’s some other way out of the trap that I’m not thinking of.”

    Of course there is. The irrational way. The argument that turns a blind eye to the blatant inconsistency of their own perspectives, uses shame to coerce their own agenda, and basically perpetuates the never-ending shit-test that their “movement” actually is. They will ardently cling to their programmed mindset that “gender is flux and taught by the prevailing social order” and with as much hostile conviction vehemently spit that “one cannot choose what their biology makes them sexually attracted to.”

    How can they do this? Well, to have the power to control the discourse, one must put forward the perspective that suits them best for the argument at hand. Spit it out while shaming the one who is trying the point out the logical inconsistency with an accusation of some form of hatemongering. The power to control how everyone should think is SO much more important than realizing the truth of it all.

    Sad thing is, deep down, all they want is daddy to tell them how things are, how they should be,… and that they are pretty, … and worthy of his time, care, and protection.

    Christ chicks are burdensome lol.

    Liked by 1 person

  • Divided Line says:

    I agree. Feminism really is a political shit test. It’s women collectively begging for the very same imaginary patriarchy they complain about.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading gender isn’t a social construct at .

meta

%d bloggers like this: